To be honest... neither plan was good. Eisenhower would have been better served to keep the plan of a broad front intact. Market Garden had to many objectives that needed to be met in order for it to happen and Patton would have easily been cut off and surrounded as he would have had wide open flanks on both sides.Well studied and written.... I would like to add some more information:
The key dates would be.... again... Patton at the Rhine in August 1944; Yalta conference in February 1945 - the Western Allied Armies at the Elbe, near Berlin, in April 1945.
The pulling of gas and supplies from Patton in August of 1944 had nothing to do with a fierce enemy at the time or mounting casualties. It had everything to do with giving everything to Montgomery and permitting him to enter Germany first because the British had suffered so much and deserved the honor.
This gave us Monty's plan Operation Market-Garden, September of 1944. It was one of the worst catastrophes of the war. This bled our supplies and stalled our advance into the winter of 1944... which also gave us the Battle of the Bulge.
Could Patton have made it to Berlin before Christmas 1944? Well, he sure as hell thought he could and everything he had done with his army so far indicated he could. Instead, winter came and allowed one last German offensive.
During that time Russia advanced through Poland killing both Germans and the Polish Resistance. This was consistent with Stalin who murdered everyone he considered a future threat. At Yalta, February 1945, he promised reforms but the Western Allied armies on the ground knew of Stalin's butchery.
This leads us to the Elbe, near Berlin, in April 1945. Ike stopped the Western Allies cold even though the German army was surrendering in front of them. Could the Germans have started resistance once they got closer than 60 miles to Berlin? Maybe... but Jeeps with recon drove right up to the city without encountering a single soldier.
The fierce battle for Berlin was because the Russians were taking it. I contend that the remnants of the German army would have gladly surrendered to anybody but the Russians. Instead, Ike purposely kept the Elbe river between himself and the Russians - as he has so stated in his memoirs. Ike stayed back over the river and allowed the murdering and raping of Berlin.
Was it the best decision at the time? Well... it was the easiest. Personally, I think that the failure to support Patton way back in August 1944 was a worse decision by far. The Market-Garden disaster, the Battle of the Bulge as well as the future Soviet empire could possibly have been avoided.
Patton didnt cross the Rhine until March of 1945.
He was still fighting in France at the end of August.
If you want to know about Patton's leadership... look into the story of his failed nepotistic mission to save his son in law. Ask the members of the 101st airborne if he was as good as he claimed.
50% more deaths look good to you? And what else is Hogan supposed to do when the president refuses to do his job. He literally had to hide the masks and guard them so trump couldn't seize them. Chloroquine hasnt been approved by the CDC for treating the virus, but it hasnt stopped the Flu Klux Klan from pushing it.
Which is why I said to ask the 101st how good Patton was. Yeah, the 101st was surrounded... but as Dick Winters said, "We're paratroopers. We're supposed to be surrounded." The Germans were already losing before Patton showed up because the weather cleared and the air supremacy of the allies was able to be brought in. The German objective was never Bastogne, it was Antwerp. The 101st stopped that from happening by halting them at Bastogne. They didn't need Patton to save them... They were already winning.He was still fighting in France at the end of August.
That's correct. Patton was denied the gas and supplies despite being at the Moselle River, the tributary of the Rhine in August 1944. (see previous post). Because he was stalled we had the Battle of the Bulge (again, see previous post) where Patton made one of the most historic military maneuvers of all time....
Enter “Old Blood and Guts,” General Patton. Employing a complex and quick-witted strategy wherein he literally wheeled his 3rd Army a sharp 90 degrees in a counterthrust movement, Patton broke through the German lines and entered Bastogne, relieving the valiant defenders and ultimately pushing the Germans east across the Rhine.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/patton-relieves-bastogne
Guess who those defenders were.... I'm waiting... Yep! the 101st Airborne. Who, of course claimed they didn't need to be rescued.
Ask the members of the 101st airborne if he was as good as he claimed.
I can't... the last one died:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/41210188/ns/us_news-life/t/oldest-living-member-band-brothers-dies/
And what else is Hogan supposed to do when the president refuses to do his job. He literally had to hide the masks and guard them so trump couldn't seize them
Ugh... actually they were test kits and there were plenty available at 30% fewer cost...
Much less speculation than you saying he could drive on Berlin by himself. Didnt happen in Italy, didnt happen in France. History said it wouldn't have happened in Germany either.Patton would have easily been cut off and surrounded as he would have had wide open flanks on both sides.
Pure speculation.... history says no. Didn't happen in Italy and it didn't happen in France.
Patton would have easily been cut off and surrounded as he would have had wide open flanks on both sides.
Pure speculation.... history says no. Didn't happen in Italy and it didn't happen in France.
Which is why I said to ask the 101st how good Patton was. Yeah, the 101st was surrounded... but as Dick Winters said, "We're paratroopers. We're supposed to be surrounded." The Germans were already losing before Patton showed up because the weather cleared and the air supremacy of the allies was able to be brought in. The German objective was never Bastogne, it was Antwerp. The 101st stopped that from happening by halting them at Bastogne. They didn't need Patton to save them... They were already winning.
Of course, Patton, an attention hog if their ever was one... took all the glory. In that way, he is again like trump.
Much less speculation than you saying he could drive on Berlin by himself. Didnt happen in Italy, didnt happen in France. History said it wouldn't have happened in Germany either.
BTW, there were no open flanks in Italy and France because the allies didnt create bulges in their front lines. If you think sending Patton 300 miles behind enemy lines by himself wouldn't have created flanks, you need to freshen up on your military strategies. They would have been sending the airborne to rescue him.
The 101st in Bastogne were depleted badly, fighting men were dwindling and they were running out of ammo. The 101st was brave and would have fought until the last man was dead or out of ammo. They were also supported by the 333rd Artillery Regiment - The Black Battalion, that was relegated to only using a handful of shells per day and were given rifles to defend the front line.
Bastogne was one of the key objective’s of the Germans. The Germans had no chance of success without the city because of the main crossroads. Bastogne was the key village with 7 main thoroughfares leading in all directions. That is why the Germans basically through suicide assaults at the town with their troops, tanks and Luftwaffe sorties and why the Allies ordered that it be held at all costs. It’s why Patton was allowed to divert his army and march his men, nearly 100 miles in two days of harsh whether to reinforce Bastogne. If the Germans were able to get Bastogne, the Allies would have been cut in half and Belgium could have been retaken and Paris would have been exposed.
One of the reasons the Germans were losing before Patton arrived on the continent was because of the mere presence of Patton in Dover, England, as the Commander of the First United States Army Group (the Ghost Army). The German high command feared no Allied commander more than Patton and it was ingenious of Eisenhower to put Patron there. Because of Patton’s presence with this fake army, Hitler refused to release his Panzer divisions from the Port of Calais on 06/06/1944 and would not do so for days at the urging of his commanders at the front. Hitler was sure that since Patton was in Dover, the Normandy landings were a diversion. Patton was not even present on the battlefield but his reputation affected the German response.
We can argue Patton’s ethics, ego, and self-grandeur. I would probably agree with you on many points, but don’t be completely influenced by George C. Scott’s portrayal. I know about the son-in-law mission and I don’t disagree with the nonsense of it. I also didn’t like his tactics used in the Battle of Aachen. Eisenhower should have probably ordered Patton to bypass the city, or surround and besiege it instead of frontal assaults.
But nonetheless, attempts to politicize Patton in terms of the current virus pandemic is silly.
Except, they aren't available when the government keeps confiscating them from the states at 100% loss.
https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/feds-confiscate-masks-meant-for-miami-dade-firefighters/2223847/
https://www.businessinsider.com/cor...-taking-states-masks-ventilator-orders-2020-4
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-04-07/hospitals-washington-seize-coronavirus-supplies
In another 18 months or so, when the CDC releases its final data analysis of COV-19, we will all discover how erroneous medical leaders and politicians making decisions bombed...as in nuclear proportions. This current hoax will go down as quite possibly of the single biggest blunder of the modern medical and political society. I understand in the beginning, when there was no way to be certain, that caution had to prevail. But now we have a grip of reality because we have substantiated data.
I have screamed since mid-March that society should have been isolating and protecting the elderly and the critical from the start with every means possible. The rest of the public, not. For those that want to argue a continuance of economic shut down and Stay at Home orders given the statistics we have, I assume they mean shut down until for another year or so until there is a cure. Because COV-19 isn't going to disappear. Under that analogy of "we can't kill people", we cannot open until there is a cure, period. That argument is so full of fear and blindness. I don't need a medical article from UMPC to show me the data. I understand basic mathematics. Out of all the people tested in Maryland, 18.8% of them have tested positive. That is an easy leap to know with zero uncertainty, that anywhere from 10-18% of the population has or had this virus. The mortality rate is below 1%, even more so factoring in the rate for people under the age of 50.
Move on and open up the politically correct fear and loathing cave door.
UPMC doctor argues COVID-19 not as deadly as feared, says its hospitals will shift back to normal
https://www.pennlive.com/news/2020/...-its-hospitals-will-shift-back-to-normal.html
I didn't go to Woodstock because I was too busy partying with friends during the summer at Frostburg State, the small college play capital of the world at that time. But starting in December 68 and thru the summer of 69 the Hong Kong flu pandemic eventually killed a hundred thousand in the US alone... that is with a much smaller population in which to spread. Aside from a few newspaper articles, nobody even noticed.... and, why should they... it was just a nasty flu season.
What we have now is not a pandemic.... it's a plandemic. I used to joke about waking up one day and finding that the powers that be had thrown the switch ending our freedoms with half the population not even noticing. Well, I think they've done it... and yes, I think half the folks don't realize it.
We're in a room with a dark bag over our heads. The only thing we hear is a constant voice telling us of the new grim 'total of cases' and the new 'death toll' - as though there are a never ending and ever growing millions out there, once infected, never get well and continue to infect and kill others.
The new ruling oligarchy will take the bag off our heads when they expect we will settle for anything just to get the bag off... even full servitude.
Maryland.gov Dashboard lumps all testing positive as a new 'case' - of which there are now 24,473. They claim only 1,590 have been released from Isolation - understanding quarantine is if you have come in contact and isolation is if you test positive. So, they are suggesting that out of over 24 thousand (starting back in March) only 1,590 are no longer sick? Most people are only mildly sick for two weeks. So what gives? What's going on?
Woodstock Occurred in the Middle of a Pandemic
https://www.aier.org/article/woodstock-occurred-in-the-middle-of-a-pandemic/
George Carlin was definitely the man
George Carlin was definitely the man
People: read that link Lag posted. Get some perspective as to how our world has changed. The H3N2 Hong Kong virus of 1968-70 was far more deadly than COV-19 at this point. Yet...nothing was shut down. Nothing. Not even a concert with half a million people crammed in. Woodstock had no soap or sanitizer.
In RE: H3N2 - The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that in total, the virus killed one million people worldwide.[11]
United States[edit]
The CDC estimated 100,000 people died in the U.S.[12] However, fewer people died during this pandemic than in previous pandemics for various reasons:[13]
- some immunity against the N2 flu virus may have been retained in populations struck by the Asian Flu strains which had been circulating since 1957;
- the pandemic did not gain momentum until near the winter school holidays, thus limiting the infection spreading;
- improved medical care gave vital support to the very ill;
- the availability of antibiotics that were more effective against secondary bacterial infections.
The H3N2 virus killed an estimated 100,000 Americans over a 3 year period. We're barely into the third MONTH of Covid-19 (with safety precautions in place) and already at 70% of that virus' mortality numbers.
I believe the H3N2 comparison is called a red herring. It's not directly relevant.
The Hong Kong Flu and COV-19 death rates are pretty close to identical. We only need statistics from here on out, not fear. Numbers don't lie no matter how much an opinion wants to twist them and make them more or less valuable.
If you want to twist numbers - or at least apply them from 1968 to 2020, then understand there were 200 million people in the US in 1968, 3.3 million today. Plugging in the same data, we would have had a quarter of a million dead from Hong Kong Flu today as stated in Lag's link.
They are panicking right now. Media is selling a new outbreak. Maybe someone has figured out how to make it happen.... or, at least, fudge the numbers to indicate that it will happen.
The Hong Kong Flu and COV-19 death rates are pretty close to identical. We only need statistics from here on out, not fear. Numbers don't lie no matter how much an opinion wants to twist them and make them more or less valuable.
If you want to twist numbers - or at least apply them from 1968 to 2020, then understand there were 200 million people in the US in 1968, 3.3 million today. Plugging in the same data, we would have had a quarter of a million dead from Hong Kong Flu today as stated in Lag's link.
What's the current population of the US?
All of Europe, including Italy, have reopened and people have gone back to work. Schools opening back up. I expect the rest of America to follow suite very shortly outside of opening schools. As for Maryland and Gov Hogan, he will have no choice. Life will start to resume to a degree. But many businesses will be closed for good.
Italy leads Europe in easing coronavirus lockdown measures
https://www.npr.org/sections/corona...turn-to-work-in-italy-after-weeks-of-lockdown
It was obvious what you meant.
Old Boss Hog trying to make a name for himselfWe can see what Herr Hogan chooses to do.... threaten to arrest a MD Delegate for wanting to hold a rally against the shutdown...
“Threatening a legislator with arrest for exercising his first amendment right to free speech is not only unconstitutional, it is wrong," Parrot said. "We live in a Republic, and I want to make sure that no one person in Maryland or in any other state of the nation should be able to have unchecked power. ”
https://foxbaltimore.com/news/local...yPjbceGOMksSqMhcUuBVz9i267QBXwEfRXi25y3NiB8Sc