You say FH is the best 1A team in the state...then always follow it up with a caveat. Always. "Fort Hill is the best 1A team in the state...but they don't play the best teams in the state." well, no they don't. "North Dakota State is the best team in FCS....but they don't play Alabama"...could you imagine telling your wife "This is the best dinner you've ever made...but you're no Wolfgang Puck." Hope your couch is comfortable.
That's the issue I have with your posts. You equate two irrelevancies with each other, then try to play passive-aggressive when someone points out that you are putting a disclaimer on every accolade you hand out. FH is the best 1A team in the state. No one is convinced that means FH is ready to tackle Good Counsel or be ranked in the USA Today top 25. Everyone knows that winning a 1A title means you may not play quite the same caliber of teams that you might in winning the 4A title. Just like N Dakota State knows that winning the FCS doesn't mean they could run the BCS table. Why do you feel the need to consistently point the obvious out? The only thing I can surmise is that you have an agenda to detract from any accolade or achievement that FH gets. It's no different than the FH people saying if Dunbar didn't recruit they wouldn't have beaten FH all those years...etc. Not everything needs to be qualified or have an asterisk.
You feel me?