Dunbars QB was as much a part of the game for his legs moreso than his arm. He was a dual threat, but less accurate on passing than Collazo. And given more success against the run, Alco was able to contain #7 enough to pull the game out.
MCC qb was moving alot, but not past the line of scrimmage. he had no rushing yards. He was as pure a Passer this stadium hs seen since the big kid from Brunswick in 2011. But he had the added threat of two very obvious D1 receivers to target. Yuuuge difference between MCC and Dunbar.
BUT..Alco was able to stop big running attempts by #7. They earned that win. FH relied on a few more big passing stops to earn the that win.
Dunbar and MCC had some similarities but were really more different than alike.
edit. I realize I kinda did what you asked not to do. lol. I think the difference is Dunbar will rely more heavily on QB running, and FH may be better apt to contain a dual threat QB than a pure pocket passer.