I had not heard anybody say the campers were going to be pushovers. Whoever said that was smokin' something. With some excellent returners, a very good jv squad, team speed, size, and the fullback set...one would have to be foolish to think the campers aren't going to be tough all year.
Alco vs Dunbar official thread
- Thread starter hbpass2
- Start date
I am kicking myself right now for I have done what I have seen many others do on here and swore I would never....I have fallen into the vortex of Lag's ignorant banter. And when I say ignorant, I mean just that "lacking knowledge or awareness". I am not here to defend Max Preps, Robert M, or anything pertaining to Alco/Dunbar. But what I do hate is incorrect information passed off as fact. First, of all, Max preps is a tool to use for scheduling, rosters, etc. I've done the reporting for another sport on an occasion and I'll tell you it is not an enjoyable experience. It's hard to concentrate on game along with updating the site, so give Robert M a break. And last but most important, those "reviews" that you read and keep alluding to are not done by the game reporter. They are automated reviews created by an algorithm on Max preps site using the game data submitted. Your team reporter has no control over the review. I do enjoy reading some of your insight Lags...just hoping you stick more to what you know.
Not going to name kids but Fort Hill's fullback last year played basketball and football at Braddock. Left and went to FH after 8th grade. The fullback before him played 1 year at Braddock
Only to those who want it hijacked.... Hopefully I can sum things up in my next post so as to avoid the similar fate of another thread that became boring and thus ended.
I ran your post through my Lagorithm. The result is strictly commentary with occasional corrections to any abysmal poverty of thought:
"I am kicking myself right now for I have done what I have seen many others do on here and swore I would never....I have fallen into the vortex of Lag's"- lag correct >.... logic and in haste didn't think about what I was posting and most assuredly didn't think about it afterword.
But that's okay. As a not-too-far-away spavined septuagenarian, I often vortex-it myself and gotten into the habit of rereading my posts - < lag unsolicited advice..
Here's your comment:
"They are automated reviews created by an algorithm on Max preps site using the game data submitted."
lag commentary >
Gee! I wonder where the game data came from? Oh yes! done by the "reporter."
Here's your logic:
"Your team reporter has no control over the review."
lag commentary
Ugh... Say what? Singularity must have struck the algorithms – computer take over writ large!
And.... in an attempt to be as clear as the finest crystal:
Me:
"The idiot filled in all the unfinished quarters"
You:
"...he probably had no choice but to fill in the remaining quarters as zero.."
Me:
"...there is a game canceled option....if you put your name out there you should strive for a modicum of accuracy."
You:
"So when you were a Max Preps reporter, you saw an option to hit that the game was cancelled (sic)."
Me:
"One joins Max Preps in order to get the full features of the site. Once you do that you can go through all the options, including reporting if you want to. There are also options to correct bad information; but after reading the fake review of the game.... why bother."
In summary:
I read the game data and the recap, which is linked on the same page. No more, no less. Data in, fake recap out.
Last edited:
Similar threads
