ADVERTISEMENT

Fort Hill to play Martinsburg

TDHelmick

Hall of Fame Poster
May 29, 2001
6,739
2,839
113
Ah, got everyone again. It's a JV game next week. Two great teams though.

A little promotion never hurts. Ticket sales to help out FH athletics at the gate.

313033466_1498222270697896_8397050766429692061_n.jpg
 
Game was closer than final score. 2 late Tds by Martinsburg in the final 5 minutes was the difference. Very concerned about the amount of offensive holding calls on FH. It has been a problem with the varsity throughout the season. If trickling down to the JV, someone needs to look at the philosophical fundamental blocking techniques, and schemes. Offensive holding should not be an entire program problem. JV played behind the chains most of the night.
 
Game was closer than final score. 2 late Tds by Martinsburg in the final 5 minutes was the difference. Very concerned about the amount of offensive holding calls on FH. It has been a problem with the varsity throughout the season. If trickling down to the JV, someone needs to look at the philosophical fundamental blocking techniques, and schemes. Offensive holding should not be an entire program problem. JV played behind the chains most of the night.

Could that be a byproduct of not lifting during the season?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ravemwp
Could that be a byproduct of not lifting during the season?
Lifting helps with strength. This seems to be more about technique to me. So much is interior. As the game has evolved, there is a lot of using hands to block. Need to keep your hands in. Back in the seventies we were taught to block with our forearms and keep our hands in. A little trick we were taught if we held our own jerseys we couldn't hold theirs. Not sure what techniques are being taught now, but I see FH get called for more holding then any team in the area.
 
Last edited:
Game was closer than final score. 2 late Tds by Martinsburg in the final 5 minutes was the difference. Very concerned about the amount of offensive holding calls on FH. It has been a problem with the varsity throughout the season. If trickling down to the JV, someone needs to look at the philosophical fundamental blocking techniques, and schemes. Offensive holding should not be an entire program problem. JV played behind the chains most of the night.
Not really. Martinsburg controlled the game. Fort Hill was fortunate to stay as close as they did for as long as they did. Sentinels only really moved the ball on one drive. Martinsburg drove down inside the Fort Hill 15 twice and turned it over, one being a botched snap. Final reflects how the game went overall. Martinsburg was solidly better, but Fort Hill wasn’t dominated.
 
Not really. Martinsburg controlled the game. Fort Hill was fortunate to stay as close as they did for as long as they did. Sentinels only really moved the ball on one drive. Martinsburg drove down inside the Fort Hill 15 twice and turned it over, one being a botched snap. Final reflects how the game went overall. Martinsburg was solidly better, but Fort Hill wasn’t dominated.
I agree that Martinsburg was the better team, but remember FH turned the ball over several times as well giving Martinsburg a short field. Fort Hills failure to sustain drives had a lot to do with so many holding penalties that I mentioned previously. Turnovers and holding penalties were very much the problem for FH. You can't keep shooting yourself in the foot against good teams. Same goes for Varsity. Taking nothing away from MR or Alco, FH was their own worst enemy in both of those games. My opinion is if they don't clean that up there will be no trip to Annapolis.
 
Last edited:
The Dawgs at every level always seem to have that one beautiful aspect that makes the spread offense be at its finest. That is a fast QB who can both run and throw. When you have got that, you have the prime spread factor to build around.

Lots of mistakes and balls on the turf by both teams.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT