ADVERTISEMENT

Storyline: FH forfeits games due to an ineligible player - Part II

TDHelmick

Hall of Fame Poster
May 29, 2001
6,985
3,371
113
LINK: https://cumberlandsmagic.com/2025/01/22/11475/

Story is up and running. This is the father's side of the story, not mine. I am doing all I can so far to remove opinion and just telling what happened.

From what I see, this whole thing (regardless of who is right or wrong) is based on administrative issues, procedural errors and an unwritten policy employees and parents have no clue as to the details. It's like all sides are trying to put together a puzzle where all the pieces don't fit.

Apologies for the paragraph spacing. This became a platform issue with copy & paste. Other social media outlets have the spacing - which is easier on the eyes.
 
Talk about moving the goal posts and then taking the goal posts down completely at the end. What a terrible look for the BOE. It really makes you wonder if Jeff blank retiring had anything to do with how messed up this situation got.
 
Talk about moving the goal posts and then taking the goal posts down completely at the end. What a terrible look for the BOE. It really makes you wonder if Jeff blank retiring had anything to do with how messed up this situation got.
If the procedures to re-enroll the son at Fort Hill this January were in place back in August, none of this would have happened.

But there was no procedure to prevent such, which is why it was like a puzzle with pieces that don't fit that every student, parent, PPW, principal, coach had to assemble and interpret.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hbpass2
Finally some procedures with teeth were put in place. But why all the eventual pound-of-flesh documentation when historically you'd expect people moving into the community from out of state would want to do the right thing and be part of the community. It appears that was never the intent.

So, nobody cares about the position it puts the students... the coach... the program... the school... in fact, Cumberland as a whole - yes Cumberland... because the Fort Hill football program is probably the last crown jewel left in the city.
 
Finally some procedures with teeth were put in place. But why all the eventual pound-of-flesh documentation when historically you'd expect people moving into the community from out of state would want to do the right thing and be part of the community. It appears that was never the intent.

So, nobody cares about the position it puts the students... the coach... the program... the school... in fact, Cumberland as a whole - yes Cumberland... because the Fort Hill football program is probably the last crown jewel left in the city.
The last two sentences of paragraph one says all that needs to be said. BOE's are far from perfect but it would never had been an issue had the adult done what was right. Case closed!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lagmeister
The last two sentences of paragraph one says all that needs to be said. BOE's are far from perfect but it would never had been an issue had the adult done what was right. Case closed!
Done what was right? What would that be?

Doesn't matter. The MPSSAA should never have been involved like countless of times the past 2 decades. He was eligIble up until Homecoming. Going back and retro actively forcing forfeits by the same group that made him eligible in the first place, even after the head coach called them out, is as stupid as it can get.
 
Last edited:
Done what was right? What would that be?

Doesn't matter. The MPSSAA should never have been involved like countless of times the past 2 decades. He was eligIble up until Homecoming. Going back and retro actively forcing forfeits by the same group that made him eligible in the first place, even after the head coach called them out, is as stupid as it can get.

The Dad should have done what was right. You want to play somewhere you move there or do the procedures right. He lied and got caught. The unfortunate thing was that the kids got pushished. I'm not here to argue the point of the losses just that the Dad should have done the right thing.
 
You don't change the mailing address of a utility bill to Cumberland for a residence in WV. He knew exactly what he was up to.

This is on the parents.

Period.
 
So just to clarify, are the points of these articles to try and exonerate the parent (which they do the opposite) or to show that FH shouldn't have been punished? Either way, this latest article does a good job of showing how when a parent makes the decision to lie they will get mired in bureaucracy trying to fix things...all the while causing stress and anxiety to everyone along the way. FH got caught up in it.

Probably wasn't your intention, but this last installment is a pretty strong indictment against Babo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lagmeister
So just to clarify, are the points of these articles to try and exonerate the parent (which they do the opposite) or to show that FH shouldn't have been punished? Either way, this latest article does a good job of showing how when a parent makes the decision to lie they will get mired in bureaucracy trying to fix things...all the while causing stress and anxiety to everyone along the way. FH got caught up in it.

Probably wasn't your intention, but this last installment is a pretty strong indictment against Babo.
Time for all of us to move on from this.
 
Last edited:
You don't change the mailing address of a utility bill to Cumberland for a residence in WV. He knew exactly what he was up to.

This is on the parents.

Period.
The goal was to put no opinion in these first two parts. Just tell the story of what happened. Readers can make up their own mind on who/what may have been right or wrong.

On here, most know I have no issues speaking my mind. I agree with what you stated concerning the utility bill with a different mailing address. But you also don't accept that utility bill as a decision maker. Do you not agree? Pretty ridiculous a parent would offer it and way more ridiculous the BOE would accept it. Then turn around 2 months later and punish an entire team on a bad decision you made. If I am the person in charge of approving the transfer, especially when the head coach just questioned this decision, I'm telling the father "sorry, but that bill is not acceptable." That seems like common sense. Maybe I'm off my rocker as I get old, LOL.

The people in charge originally are all good people I actually trust. I think some mistakes were made with policy (or a lack of) and it didn't get handled well when the house of cards collapsed.

Seems to me the stuff that was required to re-enroll the son the second time around was the right way to do this through policy. Show me you are paying Maryland taxes, etc. I'm assuming this may be the policy now moving forward. But who knows.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ravemwp
Of course the parent was originally wrong, but that doesn’t exonerate the BOE. Remember the BOE basically approved him with no real concrete confirmation of proof of residency. When he decided to play football, and the coach, and administrators reached out to BOE for clarity on this particular student, again he was approved. My belief at this point, partly because in small town America everyone is in the know of athletic transfers, that a thorough investigation should have been done. The BOE wouldn’t grant FH an investigation, but 7 weeks later some dude named Justin, can blow this all up with a simple phone call. I will reiterate that my reason for wanting the truth to be told, was to reform the system. I think all of this could have been avoided if the original enrollment process was the same as the re-enrollment process. You can bet your a$$ had Maddox Twigg tried to enroll at FH the investigation would have been long and deep, before he even stepped foot on that campus. You do know that if a student is approved for enrollment at a particular school, and the family moves out of that school district during the school year, that the student is eligible to finish the school year at their current school. So technically once the BOE deemed him eligible to attend FH, his family could have moved to Montana, and he would have the option to finish the school year at FH provided he could get himself there. One thing I wholeheartedly agree with is that you are eligible until you ineligible. You can’t retroactively penalize. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Yes the parent was wrong, but the BOE is equally to blame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TDHelmick
The goal was to put no opinion in these first two parts. Just tell the story of what happened. Readers can make up their own mind on who/what may have been right or wrong.

On here, most know I have no issues speaking my mind. I agree with what you stated concerning the utility bill with a different mailing address. But you also don't accept that utility bill as a decision maker. Do you not agree? Pretty ridiculous a parent would offer it and way more ridiculous the BOE would accept it. Then turn around 2 months later and punish an entire team on a bad decision you made. If I am the person in charge of approving the transfer, especially when the head coach just questioned this decision, I'm telling the father "sorry, but that bill is not acceptable." That's seems like common sense. Maybe I'm off my rocker as I get old, LOL.

Seems to me the stuff that was required to re-enroll the son the second time around was the right way to do this through policy. Show me you are paying Maryland taxes, etc. I'm assuming this may be the policy now moving forward. But who knows.
I’m laughing out loud as we must have been writing the exact same thing in so many words at the exact same time. 😂😂
 
I couldn't agree more.
Don't mean this in disrespect, but move on if you choose. It's easy. "All of us" can make up our own minds. I still have a final Part III coming out.

The story needed told. As I keep repeating...had this all went down a week later, FH has their season ended. That's a problem that deserves the attention.
 
Last edited:
I will agree that perhaps in the times we are living in now, with multiple transfers yearly, that some type of policy needs put in place to make the punishment fit the athlete individually more than the team. Of course if there is evidence of tampering by a coach then that would be different. In this case that would not apply.

With the family dynamics in a state of chaos everywhere, school systems really struggle trying to make sure that students are going to school in the right place. These poor students live with Moms, Dad’s, Mom’s Boyfriends, Dad’s Girlfriends, Grandma, Grandpap, Aunts, Uncles and Foster Parents. Imagine trying to police all of that and then throw in athletic transfers.


There are an over abundance of policies and rules put in place at the federal, state and local levels that tie funding into enrollment and specific needs of students and parents. Contrary to what we want, students cannot just go where they want because of all of this. There has to be some kind or structure to keep it all together but those whose job it is to do that certainly have my sympathy.
 
Don't mean this in disrespect, but move on if you choose. It's easy. "All of us" can make up our own minds. I still have a final Part III coming out.

The story needed told. As I keep repeating...had this all went down a week later, FH has their season ended. That's a problem that deserves the attention.


What deserves attention is the fact that ALL of this was avoidable. The parent, who admitted several times in your article to lying, caused ALL of this. He admitted to falsifying a utility bill. He admitted the child was NOT spending nights at the Cumberland location and had only been there a handful of times in the previous months.

Also, it is well known that he had talked to several sources about his son playing football at FH over the summer. I overheard one of those conversations myself. This was a scheme. That's what deserves attention.


Again, dishonorable actions have far reaching consequences. People who've done nothing wrong get caught up in it. The ONLY person who did anything wrong in this whole issue was the parent. Everyone else was caught in the crossfire. You're seemingly insinuating that those caught in the gunfight should've moved...not that the person shooting shouldn't have been shooting in the first place.

From a pragmatist POV such as mine, the energy and focus of this whole ordeal is aimed at the wrong target.
 
Here's the problem, if the student only stayed at the Cumberland location 10 total days for the months of September and October, then he was ineligible. A residence is where you live and sleep. Renting an apartment but not staying there is trying to game the system. I agree the BOE seemed to keep moving the goal posts and I feel the father's frustration as we all despise the red tape of government bureaucracy but in reading this as a neutral observer, the father is not blameless here. If you live in West Virginia, you should attend school in WV. If Frankfort wasn't right for the kid, there is always Keyser or Hampshire. If you don't pay Maryland taxes, you shouldn't be allowed to attend public school in Maryland.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ravemwp and FHHSAHS
What deserves attention is the fact that ALL of this was avoidable. The parent, who admitted several times in your article to lying, caused ALL of this. He admitted to falsifying a utility bill. He admitted the child was NOT spending nights at the Cumberland location and had only been there a handful of times in the previous months.

Also, it is well known that he had talked to several sources about his son playing football at FH over the summer. I overheard one of those conversations myself. This was a scheme. That's what deserves attention.


Again, dishonorable actions have far reaching consequences. People who've done nothing wrong get caught up in it. The ONLY person who did anything wrong in this whole issue was the parent. Everyone else was caught in the crossfire. You're seemingly insinuating that those caught in the gunfight should've moved...not that the person shooting shouldn't have been shooting in the first place.

From a pragmatist POV such as mine, the energy and focus of this whole ordeal is aimed at the wrong target.
This is common in WV also. Maryland has the MPSSA and WV has the WVSSAC. They are the governing bodies of high school sports in their respective states. They are far from perfect but the have the impossible job of enforcing rules that everyone likes to break and then find ways to project the blame on the organization or circumvent the consequences from their actions which often includes ending up in court.

Ironically it was not like that for decades, Minor issues yes, but the ongoing chaos that they have to deal with now, no way. There is no respect for authority anymore which is a big reason why we have shortages of teachers, police, game officials and coaches. You reap waht you sow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ravemwp
I know that I have been repeating some things ad nauseam. The father was wrong. We get that. What’s the old cliché. “Sometimes the cover up is worse than the crime”. I just can’t seem to get past why coach Alkire’s request for clarity on eligibility seemed to just slide right past the BOE without raising any red flags, yet some random dude named Justin got the BOE to do a full court press, simply by questioning why Babo was in math class. Because we all know that the real reason Justin called was because of his concern that Babo was getting a Maryland education, but paying WVA taxes. Football never entered into the equation. Let’s be real here, if not for football this call never gets made, and the kid gets a Maryland education, and how many here would have cared. So again I say, nobody here really gives a damn where a kid goes to school, we only care were he plays sports. Doesn’t that make us all a little hypocritical.
 
This is common in WV also. Maryland has the MPSSA and WV has the WVSSAC. They are the governing bodies of high school sports in their respective states. They are far from perfect but the have the impossible job of enforcing rules that everyone likes to break and then find ways to project the blame on the organization or circumvent the consequences from their actions which often includes ending up in court.

Ironically it was not like that for decades, Minor issues yes, but the ongoing chaos that they have to deal with now, no way. There is no respect for authority anymore which is a big reason why we have shortages of teachers, police, game officials and coaches. You reap waht you sow.
In actuality it has always been going on in Cumberland. For instance when FH won its first state championship in 1975, it was no secret that their original starting QB lived right smack dab in the middle of Allegany territory. People have always found ways to circumvent the system. I don’t claim to know the answers, but I do believe we do need bring the system into the 21st century. Maybe someone can clarify the Allegany County school district’s. It’s my understanding that one of the most important factors was transportation to and from the closest school. If someone can clarify that, please do. I am not positive on that. Transportation in 1925 is not the same as 2025.
 
In actuality it has always been going on in Cumberland. For instance when FH won its first state championship in 1975, it was no secret that their original starting QB lived right smack dab in the middle of Allegany territory. People have always found ways to circumvent the system. I don’t claim to know the answers, but I do believe we do need bring the system into the 21st century. Maybe someone can clarify the Allegany County school district’s. It’s my understanding that one of the most important factors was transportation to and from the closest school. If someone can clarify that, please do. I am not positive on that. Transportation in 1925 is not the same as 2025.
You are correct about FH’s QB in ‘75. He lived on the same street as Braddock Middle School. Unfortunately, due to illness, he was not able to finish the ‘75 season.

As I know it, the ACPS permits in-county transfers (out of district permits) as long as parents/guardians provide transportation to the school.

There is a formal process that needs to be followed.

School administrators can accept or reject an out of district permit. Often times such decisions are made based on the requesting transfer’s past attendance, past grades, the reason for the request, and past behavior.

Again, the previous is based on an in county transfer.

Regarding a student living out of county or out of state, proof of residence in Allegany County would be needed or the $18,000.00 tuition fee would need to be paid. Transportation would need to be provided by the family, too.
 
It may be lost in my presentation, I DO agree that there needs to be clear and concise adherence to out of state transfer issues - does that mean new policies need created or more strict attention to the policies that exist - I dont know. It doesn't seem to be that pervasive - however it is ironic that this year there were two publicly discussed situations that were handled very differently with out of state transfers. One from WV to MD and another from MD to WV. I have no dog in the fight or insight into the process of going from MD to WV, but my assumption is it was done correctly as there was no fallout. But I digress...my concern is not about the "why," if families make decisions to send their kids wherever, that's their decision and its between them and their respective BOEs.

But we can't lose sight of the fact that if you don't do it the right way, especially if you intentionally are doing it in a sketchy way, existing policy may not be clear enough on figuring that out ahead of time. And you are going to create a real mess. As we've seen. Can the BOE do better, probably. But do I think the ACBOE policies were the reason this became a mess, no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ravemwp
“This....is a travesty. It's
a travesty of a mockery of a
sham of a mockery of a
travesty of two mockeries
of a sham.”
-Woody Allen -

If layered misfeasance is malfeasance, then the end result was always a fait accompli.​
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT